Journal of the Chinese Medical Association
Volume 73, Issue 3 , Pages 139-143, March 2010

Good Mortality Prediction by Glasgow Coma Scale for Neurosurgical Patients

  • Hsien-Wei Ting

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neurosurgery, Taipei Hospital, Department of Health, Taipei, R.O.C.
    • Department of Information Management, Yuan Ze University, Taoyuan, Taiwan, R.O.C.
    • ,
  • Ming-Shung Chen

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neurosurgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C.
    • ,
  • Yueh-Chun Hsieh

      Affiliations

    • Genomics Laboratory, Phalanx Biotech Inc., Hsinchu, Taiwan, R.O.C.
    • ,
  • Chien-Lung Chan

      Affiliations

    • Department of Information Management, Yuan Ze University, Taoyuan, Taiwan, R.O.C.
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence to: Dr Chien-Lung Chan, Department of Information Management, Yuan Ze University, 135, Yuan-Tung Road, Chung-Li 320, Taiwan, R.O.C.

Received 27 March 2009; accepted 19 January 2010.

Article Outline

Background

How to effectively use the finite resources of an intensive care unit (ICU) for neurosurgical patients is a critical decision-making process. Mortality prediction models are effective tools for allocating facilities. This study intended to distinguish the prediction power of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II), the Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II), and the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) for neurosurgical patients.

Methods

According to the definitions of the APACHE II, this study recorded both APACHE II and SAPS II scores of 154 neurosurgical patients in the ICU of a 600-bed general hospital. Linear regression models of GCS (GCS-mr) were constructed. The t test, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and Wilcoxon signed rank test were used as the statistical evaluation methods.

Results

There were 50 (32.5%) females and 104 (67.5%) males in this study. Among them, 108 patients survived and 46 patients died. The areas under the ROC curves (AUC) of SAPS II and APACHE II were 0.872 and 0.846, respectively. The AUC of GCS-mr was 0.866, and the R2 was 0.389. The evaluation powers of SAPS II, GCS-mr and APACHE II were the same (p > 0.05). Patients with GCS ≤ 5 or motor component of GCS (GCS-M) ≤ 3 had a higher probability of mortality than patients with GCS > 5 or GCS-M > 3 (p < 0.01).

Conclusion

The predictive powers of SAPS II, APACHE II and GCS-mr were the same. The GCS-mr is more convenient for predicting mortality in neurosurgical patients. Both GCS ≤ 5 and GCS-M ≤ 3 are good indicators of mortality in these patients.

Key Words:  APACHE II , Glasgow Coma Scale , linear regression model , mortality prediction model , SAPS II

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

 

Back to Article Outline

References 

  1. Lemeshow S , Teres D , Pastides H , Avrunin JS , Steingrub JS . A method for predicting survival and mortality . Crit Care Med . 1985;13:519–525
  2. Katsaragakis S , Papadimitropoulos K , Antonakis P , Strergiopoulos S , Konstadoulakis MM , Androulakis G . Comparison of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) and Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II) scoring systems in a single Greek intensive care unit . Crit Care Med . 2000;28:426–432
  3. Knaus WA , Draper EA , Wagner DP , Zimmerman JE . APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system . Crit Care Med . 1985;13:818–829
  4. Le Gall JR , Lemeshow S , Saulnier F . A new simplified acute physiology score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study . JAMA . 1993;270:2957–2963
  5. Schuster HP , Schuster FP , Ritschel P , Wilts S , Bodmann KF . The ability of the Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) to predict outcome in coronary care patients . Intensive Care Med . 1997;23:1056–1061
  6. Moran JL, Solomon PJ, Fox V, Salagaras M, Williams PJ, Quinlan K, et al. Modeling thirty-day mortality in the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in an adult ICU . Anaesth Intensive Care . 2004;32:317–329
  7. Kroschinsky F, Weise M, Illmer T, Haenel M, Bornhaeuser M, Hoeffken G, et al  Outcome and prognostic features of intensive care unit treatment in patients with hematological malignancies . Intensive Care Med . 2002;28:1294–1300
  8. Tan IKS . APACHE II and SAPS II are poorly calibrated in a Hong Kong intensive care unit . Ann Acad Med Singapore . 1998;27:318–322
  9. Schellongowski P, Benesch M, Lang T, Traunmuller F, Zauner C, Laczika K, et al  Comparison of three severity scores for critically ill cancer patients . Intensive Care Med . 2004;30:430–436
  10. O'Dair GN , Leaper DJ . Sequential physiology scoring facilitates objective assessment of resuscitation in patients with an intra-abdominal emergency . Br J Surg . 2003;90:1445–1450
  11. Markgraf R , Deutschinoff G , Pientka L , Scholten T . Comparison of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluations II and III and Simplified Acute Physiology Score II: a prospective cohort study evaluating these methods to predict outcome in a German interdisciplinary intensive care unit . Crit Care Med . 2000;28:26–33
  12. Alvarez M , Nava JM , Rue M , Quintana S . Mortality prediction in head trauma patients: performance of Glasgow Coma Score and general severity systems . Crit Care Med . 1998;26:142–148
  13. Beck DH , Smith GB , Taylor BL . The impact of low-risk intensive care unit admissions on mortality probabilities by SAPS II, APACHE II and APACHE III . Anaesthesia . 2002;57:21–26
  14. Capuzzo M, Valpondi V, Sgarbi A, Bortolazzi S, Pavoni V, Gilli G, et al  Validation of severity scoring systems SAPS II and APACHE II in a single-center population . Intensive Care Med . 2000;26:1779–1785
  15. Jennet B , Teasdale G , Braakman R , Minderhoud J , Heiden J , Kurze T . Prognosis of patients with severe head injury . Neurosurgery . 1979;4:283–289
  16. Gerlach R , Dittrich S , Schneider W , Ackermann H , Seifert V , Kieslich M . Traumatic epidural hematomas in children and adolescents: outcome analysis in 39 consecutive unselected cases . Pediatr Emerg Care . 2009;25:164–169
  17. Ishihara M, Kamei S, Taira N, Morita A, Miki K, Naganuma T, et al  Hospital-based study of the prognostic factors in adult patients with acute community-acquired bacterial meningitis in Tokyo, Japan . Intern Med . 2009;48:295–300
  18. Demetriades D , Kuncir E , Murray J , Velmahos GC , Rhee P , Chan L . Mortality prediction of head Abbreviated Injury Score and Glasgow Coma Scale: analysis of 7,764 head injuries . J Am Coll Surg . 2004;199:216–222
  19. Cho DY , Wang YC . Comparison of the APACHE III, APACHE II and Glasgow Coma Scale in acute head injury for prediction of mortality and functional outcome . Intensive Care Med . 1997;23:77–84
  20. Swets JA . Enhancing diagnostic decisions . In:  Connolly T ,  Arkes HR ,  Hammond KR editor. Judgment and Decision Making: An Interdisciplinary Reader . Cambridge: Cambridge Press; 2003; 2nd version (66–81)
  21. Nouira S, Belghith M, Elatrous S, Jaafoura M, Ellouzi M, Boujdaria R, et al  Predictive value of severity scoring systems: comparison of four models in Tunisian adult intensive care units . Crit Care Med . 1998;26:852–859
  22. Beck DH , Smith GB , Pappachan JV , Millar B . External validation of the SAPS II, APACHE II and APACHE III prognostic models in South England: a multicentre study . Intensive Care Med . 2003;29:249–256
  23. Wheeler MM . APACHE: an evaluation . Crit Care Nurs Q . 2009;32:46–48
  24. Zimmerman JE , Kramer AA . Outcome prediction in critical care: the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation models . Curr Opin Crit Care . 2008;14:491–497
  25. Elf K , Nilsson P , Enblad P . Outcome after traumatic brain injury improved by an organized secondary insult program and standardized neurointensive care . Crit Care Med . 2002;30:2129–2134

PII: S1726-4901(10)70028-9

doi:10.1016/S1726-4901(10)70028-9

Journal of the Chinese Medical Association
Volume 73, Issue 3 , Pages 139-143, March 2010

Article Tools