Volume 69, Issue 1 , Pages 21-25, January 2006
Transurethral Prostatic Resection for Acute Urinary Retention in Patients with Prostate Cancer
Article Outline
Background
Few studies have focused on clinical findings in prostate cancer patients receiving transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for acute urinary retention (AUR). We compared the clinical findings (preoperative characteristics, operative morbidities, and pathology results) of patients with diagnosed prostate cancer undergoing palliative TURP for AUR with those of patients undergoing TURP for AUR who were diagnosed with prostate cancer postoperatively.
Methods
The charts of 25 patients with prostate cancer undergoing TURP for AUR between 1986 and 2003 were retrospectively reviewed. Fourteen patients underwent palliative TURP (group A) and the other 11 patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer received TURP (group B). The data, including preoperative characteristics, operative morbidities, and pathology results were analyzed.
Results
There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in parameters such as age at diagnosis and operation, operative time, hospitalization, and catheter duration. However, the Gleason score was higher in group A (7.6 ± 1.7) than in group B (5.4 ± 1.8) (p < 0.005). The mean resected weight was lower in group A (19.9 g) than in group B (39.5 g). Group A was more likely to receive recatheterization (33.3% vs 0%, p = 0.058) and repeat operation (28.6%), although the difference was not statistically significant. There were no complications such as transurethral resection syndrome or perioperative death in either group.
Conclusion
TURP can be performed safely for relief of AUR in patients with prostate cancer, no matter if the cancer was diagnosed before or after surgery. The higher Gleason score and more advanced cancer stage, as found in group A, may correlate to high recatheterization and reoperation rates due to preexisting tumor progression.
Key Words: prostate cancer , transurethral prostate resection , urinary retention
No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.
References
- Holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate: results from a 2-cancer, prospective, randomized trial in patients with obstructive benign prostatic hyperplasia . J Urol . 2004;172:1926–1929
- . Efficacy and morbidity of “channel” TURP . Urology . 1991;38:526–528
- . Palliative transurethral prostate resection for bladder outlet obstruction in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer . J Urol . 2004;171:668–671
- . The impact of systematic prostate biopsy on prostate cancer incidence in men with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate . J Urol . 1997;157:880–884
- . Prediction of prognosis for prostatic adenocarcinoma by combined histologic grading and clinical staging . J Urol . 1974;111:58–64
- . Classification of prostate carcinoma . Cancer Chemother Rep . 1966;50:125–128
- . Prostate . In: Greene FL , Page DL , Fleming ID , Fritz A , Balch CM , Haller DG , Morrow M editor. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual . 6th edition. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 2002;p. 309–316
- . Endocrine therapy for bladder outlet obstruction from carcinoma of the prostate . J Urol . 1985;134:498–500
- . The dissemination of cancer by transurethral resection of locally advanced prostate cancer . J Urol . 1983;129:309–311
- . Analysis of the possibility that transurethral resection promotes metastasis in prostate cancer . Cancer . 1988;62:2622–2627
- . The correlation of pretreatment transurethral resection of prostatic caner with tumor dissemination and disease free survival. A univariate and multivariate analysis . Cancer . 1986;58:1770–1778
- . The effect of transurethral prostatic resection on the incidence of osseous prostatic metastasis . Cancer . 1985;56:961–964
- Incidence, racial differences, and prognostic significance of prostate carcinomas diagnosed with obstructive symptoms . Cancer . 1994;74:1607–1611
PII: S1726-4901(09)70106-6
doi:10.1016/S1726-4901(09)70106-6
© 2006 Elsevier. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume 69, Issue 1 , Pages 21-25, January 2006
