Journal of the Chinese Medical Association
Volume 71, Issue 1 , Pages 23-29, January 2008

Comparing Different Methods of Activating the Variable Stiffness Function of a Pediatric Variable Stiffness Colonoscope

  • Yu-Hsi Hsieh

      Affiliations

    • Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Buddhist Dalin Tzu Chi General Hospital, Chia-Yi, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C.
    • Buddhist Tzu Chi University School of Medicine, Hualien, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C.
    • ,
  • An-Liang Zhou

      Affiliations

    • Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Buddhist Dalin Tzu Chi General Hospital, Chia-Yi, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C.
    • ,
  • Hwai-Jeng Lin

      Affiliations

    • Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C.
    • National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C.
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence to: Dr Hwai-Jeng Lin, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, 201, Section 2, Shih-Pai Road, Taipei 112, Taiwan, R.O.C

Received 16 July 2007; accepted 26 December 2007.

Article Outline

Background

Previous studies on variable stiffness colonoscopes showed mixed results. Different methods of activating the variable stiffness function were used and might explain part of the controversy. To determine the most efficient way of activating the variable stiffness function, this study compared 3 methods (no activation, regular activation, activation on an as-needed basis) using 1 single type of pediatric variable stiffness colonoscope.

Methods

Asymptomatic patients admitted for physical check-up at the Buddhist Dalin Tzu Chi General Hospital were included. A single endoscopist performed all of the colonoscopic examinations of patients under sedation using a variable stiffness pediatric colonoscope. Consecutive patients were randomized to undergo colonoscopy using 3 different methods of activating the variable stiffness function: no activation (“no” group), regular activation at descending colon (“regular” group), and activation on an as-needed basis (“as-needed” group). Completion rate, cecal intubation time, and use of adjunct measures were evaluated and compared among the 3 groups. Subgroup analysis by gender was also performed.

Results

Between January and July 2006, a total of 250 patients were enrolled. The completion rates of the examinations were 97.6%, 91.7% and 96.4% in the “no”, “regular” and “as-needed” groups, respectively (p = 0.17). The cecal intubation times were 5.6 ± 2.6 minutes, 5.6 ± 2.7 minutes and 6.2 ± 2.3 minutes, respectively (p = 0.22). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that activation of the variable stiffness function regularly (odds ratio [OR], 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28, 0.98; p = 0.04) or on an as-needed basis (OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.28, 0.97; p = 0.04) were independent factors that were related with less use of abdominal pressure. When only women were considered, the completion rate was lower in the “regular” group (98.0%, 86.8% and 96.5%, p = 0.04). The use of abdominal pressure was more in the “no” group than the other 2 groups (56%, 34% and 33%, p = 0.03). When only men were considered, the cecal intubation time was longer in the “as-needed” group (4.6 ± 1.4, 4.6 ± 1.8 and 5.8 ± 2.5 minutes, p = 0.02). The other outcomes were similar in both genders.

Conclusion

The 3 different methods did not result in significantly different completion rates or cecal intubation times. However, activation of the variable stiffness function decreased the need for abdominal pressure. When males and females were considered separately, activation of the variable stiffness function on an as-needed basis in females was the only useful setting.

Key Words:  cecal intubation time , colonoscopy , variable stiffness

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

 

Back to Article Outline

References 

  1. Waye JD , Bashkoff E . Total colonoscopy: is it always possible? . Gastrointest Endosc . 1991;37:152–154
  2. Horiuchi A , Nakayama Y , Kajiyama M , Fujii H , Tanaka N . Usefulness of a small-caliber, variable-stiffness colonoscope as a backup in patients with difficult or incomplete colonoscopy . Am J Gastroenterol . 2004;99:1936–1940
  3. Brooker JC , Saunders BP , Shah SG , Williams CB . A new variable stiffness colonoscope makes colonoscopy easier: a randomised controlled trial . Gut . 2000;46:801–805
  4. Odori T , Goto H , Arisawa T , Niwa Y , Ohmiya N , Hayakawa T . Clinical results and development of variable-stiffness video colonoscopes . Endoscopy . 2001;33:65–69
  5. Rex DK . Effect of variable stiffness colonoscopes on cecal intubation times for routine colonoscopy by an experienced examiner in sedated patients . Endoscopy . 2001;33:60–64
  6. Sorbi D , Schleck CD , Zinsmeister AR , Gostout CJ . Clinical application of a new colonoscope with variable insertion tube rigidity: a pilot study . Gastrointest Endosc . 2001;53:638–642
  7. Shumaker DA , Zaman A , Katon RM . A randomized controlled trial in a training institution comparing a pediatric variable stiffness colonoscope, a pediatric colonoscope, and an adult colonoscope . Gastrointest Endosc . 2002;55:172–179
  8. Shah SG , Brooker JC , Williams CB , Thapar C , Suzuki N , Saunders BP . The variable stiffness colonoscope: assessment of efficacy by magnetic endoscope imaging . Gastrointest Endosc . 2002;56:195–201
  9. Marshall JB , Perez RA , Madsen RW . Usefulness of a pediatric colonoscope for routine colonoscopy in women who have undergone hysterectomy . Gastrointest Endosc . 2002;55:838–841
  10. Krotkiewski M , Bjorntorp P , Sjostrom L , Smith U . Impact of obesity on metabolism in men and women: importance of regional adipose tissue distribution . J Clin Invest . 1983;72:1150–1162
  11. Rodriguez SA , Ormseth E , Tsuchida A . Bowel perforation with the variable stiffness colonoscope . Gastrointest Endosc . 2003;57:271–273

PII: S1726-4901(08)70068-6

doi:10.1016/S1726-4901(08)70068-6

Journal of the Chinese Medical Association
Volume 71, Issue 1 , Pages 23-29, January 2008

Article Tools